Skip to content

Independent cross-system evidence-qualified progression

AI says “Completed.”What qualifies it to move forward?

HubCop is developing a proposed control point: human and AI work advances only when independent evidence from other systems qualifies the milestone.

The aim: less checking, more qualified automation.

Proposed architecture

Human or AI acts

Completion is a claim, not self-certification.

Other systems provide signals

Independent records of what happened.

HubCop Evidence Gate

Checks the evidence this milestone requires (its Evidence Recipe) against defined rules.

Checks origin · identity · context · timing

PASS → PROGRESS
Permit the next step.
HOLD → WAIT
Required evidence is missing.
ESCALATE → REVIEW
Conflict or timeout needs judgment.

A decision before the next step, with no actor certifying its own work.

Compare with your existing stack

Two published U.S. patent applications

US-2026-0179008-A1US-2026-0179101-A1

Published applications, not granted patents. Publication does not mean a patent will issue or define the scope of any claims.

Gene Doubleday, Founder & CEO, HubCop, Inc.

Explore the HubCop Prototype