Independent cross-system evidence-qualified progression
AI says “Completed.”What qualifies it to move forward?
HubCop is developing a proposed control point: human and AI work advances only when independent evidence from other systems qualifies the milestone.
The aim: less checking, more qualified automation.
The Blueprint is a proposed evidence-gated map of one of your workflows: the milestone, the independent signals it would require, and where it would pass, hold or escalate. Tailored for discussion, not an implemented system.
Human or AI acts
Completion is a claim, not self-certification.
Other systems provide signals
Independent records of what happened.
HubCop Evidence Gate
Checks the evidence this milestone requires (its Evidence Recipe) against defined rules.
Checks origin · identity · context · timing
Qualifies evidence, then determines permission to progress.
- PASS → PROGRESS
- Permit the next step.
- HOLD → WAIT
- Required evidence is missing.
- ESCALATE → REVIEW
- Conflict or timeout needs judgment.
Proposed integration-mediated control: where integrated, HubCop would govern permission to progress and the connected system executes the action. It does not unconditionally block third-party systems.
The consequence, by design: if the required independent evidence does not qualify the milestone, the configured next step is held; conflicts or timeouts escalate to a person. No actor certifies its own work. This describes the proposed design, not deployed functionality.
Compare with your existing stackTwo published U.S. patent applications
Published applications, not granted patents; no exclusivity or claim scope is implied.
Gene Doubleday, Founder & CEO, HubCop, Inc.
Explore the HubCop Prototype